Share This Article
My two favorite topics among all social media topics, and one that a lot of law students and practicing lawyers would like to know more about, are employment law and social media. Now, when people ask me what I do, I usually say something like “My job is as a social media lawyer.
So here’s where I have to disagree. The two are related. A lot of the social media lawyers I know (and in fact, I know quite a few) are in fact employed by law firms, and they spend all of their time working on cases that lawyers have hired them to work on.
There are many types of employment law, and one that I know a few people that are very involved in is the employment law that exists in the state of California. It is called the “anti-SLAPP” law. In short, the law states that it is illegal to bring or fight a SLAPP suit in a California court. As in, filing a lawsuit to sue someone for defamation or libel.
Yes, you can sue someone in a court for defamation. How you do this is you show that the “defamatory” statements made by the defendant are false. When you do so, you are bringing a SLAPP suit. A SLAPP is a Lawsuit Against Public Performance, and it is a pretty broad category of lawsuit. It is used by the public to stop people from competing in the legal marketplace, whether it is the court or the labor market.
The first time I saw the story of a person suing an individual for defamation I thought it was a bit of a stretch because we’ve only just begun to see defamation laws in the US. I thought, “I don’t get it. I don’t understand why someone would sue someone for defamation.” Then I realized, “Wait a minute, this is a big deal right now. It’s not just about defamation.
It is not just about defamation. The legal system is actually quite complex. For example, to be able to sue someone for defamation you have to prove that the defamation claim is false. There are lots of ways to do this. For one thing, you can show that someone has done something wrong. For another, you can show that the person has done something that makes them “liable” for defamation.
This is actually a great way to use social media. A lot of people don’t realize how many defamation lawsuits there are. For example, a few years back a woman in New York City who used the internet to say offensive things about the mayor. She settled out of court.
Yes, this is the type of case that makes the media go crazy. It’s often one sided and a lot of the time frivolous. But if you’re considering suing someone for defamation (or even libel), you should seriously consider the following: 1. Did the person actually make the comment? 2. Was the statement true? 3. Did the plaintiff make out a clear case of defamation? 4. Did the defendant follow the law as it was written? 5.
We don’t know what the judge’s reasoning was for dismissing the case, but the law is clear. This is a civil case, and in order for the plaintiff to succeed, the defendant must prove that the statement is true. Now, if the plaintiff is a famous person, the defendant has a strong case: the comment was published with a degree of malice.
Yes, a social media personality can make a defamatory statement about you. Although, what really matters is whether the statement was true, and that’s the key issue in this case. As long as you have a good reason for making the statement, it’s not defamatory. So in this case, it’s not like we’re talking about a celebrity talking about a celebrity.